Writing report

some argue that universities should focus on providing graduates with the specific knowledge and skills needed for the workforce, others believe that a university’s primary role is to offer access to knowledge for its own sake, regardless of its practical application. This debate raises important questions about the function of higher education: Should universities prioritize career readiness, or should they focus on fostering intellectual growth without immediate regard for employability? Both perspectives offer valuable insights and highlight different expectations of a university’s role in society. One view is that universities should equip students with the skills and knowledge needed to succeed in their chosen careers. Supporters of this perspective argue that since many students attend university to improve their career prospects, institutions should align their programs with the demands of the job market. Practical training, technical skills, and industry-relevant knowledge can make graduates more attractive to employers and better prepared to excel in their fields. Additionally, when universities focus on employability, they can forge partnerships with businesses and industries, facilitating internships and job placements that ease the transition from education to employment. In contrast, some argue that a university’s true function should be to provide access to knowledge for the sake of intellectual and personal growth, regardless of its practical applications. This perspective suggests that higher education is not merely a stepping stone to a career but an opportunity for students to explore ideas, question assumptions, and broaden their understanding of the world. Through exposure to diverse disciplines, students develop critical thinking, creativity, and a lifelong love for learning—qualities that may not have immediate applications but are valuable for personal fulfillment and adaptability in the long run.