Writing report

Nowadays, the widespread migration of people from suburbs to urbanized areas leads to a decreasing population from the former. When it comes to the outcomes of this phenomenon, I completely agree that it will be a good sign. Historically analyzing the effects of the capability of progression in both the history of thought and financial growth will show this. To begin with, the migrated people can have a significant effect on the advancement of education. The world-famous scientists and philosophers, such as Ibn Sina and Mulla Sadra who had migrated to a city in their lifetime, could broaden our horizons about the world. Before they lived in a city, they were out of the scientific scope. However, thanks to their presence at school in a city, they could contribute to medicine and philosophy respectively. If not for their being in the city, we would not see a dramatic change in the history of human thought now. Furthermore, newcomers to cities would be able to change the history of the economy. American scientific theories of economic research state the arrival of rural people to cities resulted in the Industrial Revolution. In the early 1900s, this second-to-none moment paved the way for the later advancement of financial growth. Had not non-citizens come to cities, the economy would not have been revolutionized. In conclusion, although some say that migration can have several major impacts on the city, such as air pollution and inflation, the historical facts prove its benefits are much greater, as I argued to demonstrate.